Welcome to our comprehensive report from the Summit of the Future (September 22–23) and the Action Days (September 21–22).

Ask Summit of the Future

[tooltip] {
position: relative;
}

[tooltip]:hover:after {
content: attr(tooltip);
position: absolute;
left: 3%;
margin-top: 5px;
transform: translateX(-50%);
font-size: 16px;
min-width: 120px;
padding: 0 10px;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
border-radius: 3px;
background: #bdb6b6;
color: #000;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
font-weight: lighter;
width: 350px;
padding: 5px 10px;
}

body .container {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100vh;
}

body .container div:first-child {
margin-bottom: 3em;
}

body .container div:first-child *:first-child {
margin-top: 0;
}

body .container.second {
background-color: #333;
color: #fff;
}

body .container.three {
animation: colored 18s infinite;
background: linear-gradient(124deg, #99e6c0, #78cad2);
background-size: 1800% 1800%;
}

@keyframes colored {
0% {
background-position: 0% 82%;
}

50% {
background-position: 100% 19%;
}

100% {
background-position: 0% 82%;
}
}

body .container.three a {
color: #333;
}

body .fa-question-circle {
color: #424242;
cursor: pointer;
transition: color 180ms;
font-size: 20px;
}

body .fa-question-circle:hover {
color: #2dd881;
}

Chatbot

Digital and AI issues at the Summit of the Future

Here you can consult Diplo experts’ analysis of AI and digital issues.

Disclaimer: These highlights are based solely on statements made by countries during the Summit of the Future (both plenaries and dialogues). These highlights reflect their references to digital tech and governance-related issues and broader matters related to science, technology and innovation. They are not intended to represent an exhaustive coverage of these topics.

1. Digital cooperation and digital governance 

1.1. Global Digital Compact
  • GDC is a milestone for the global digital ecosystem (Eritrea) and a starting point for more inclusive (and effective) digital governance. (Brazil. Eritrea)
  • GDC is a groundwork / critical step towards (enhancing) global digital cooperation. (Belgium, Austria, Czechia)
  • GDC as key/important/guide to:
  • Bridge/close digital divides and the science, technology and innovation gaps between and within countries (Estonia, Sweden, Malaysia, Tunisia, Comoros, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Iran, Montenegro, Solomon Islands, Pakistan);
  • Increase access to technology (Comoros) and reduce asymmetries in access to the data economy (Brazil);
  • Share the benefits of digital technology equitably (Tanzania, Dominica), and achieve inclusive digital transformation (Latvia);
  • Empower women and girls. (Sweden)
  • GDC is an opportunity to turbocharge SDGs (Sweden, Uganda on behalf of G77, Jordan) and a blueprint for an equitable, sustainable, and resilient world (Vanuatu on behalf of Pacific SIDS).
  • GDC is important for emphasising environmental sustainability. (Sweden)
  • GDC is vital to harnessing the opportunities and mitigating the risks of using digital technologies (Laos), and important for outlining principles for a safe digital world (Tunisia) and online safety (Sweden).
  • GDC is a commitment to protecting/respecting human rights in the digital space. (Sweden, USA)
  • GDC sets the foundation to secure a future where AI serves humanity, upholds shared values, and benefits everyone. (Sweden) It is also a starting point for mitigating the impact of AI and other new technologies. (Brazil)
  • GDC is a roadmap/framework towards an open, secure, safe, and inclusive digital future/space. (Georgia, Cambodia, New Zealand)
  • GDC (and other SoF outcomes) is a milestone in reaffirming shared goals and political aspirations (Mongolia), and a recognition of the commitment of the entire international community to coordinate on new challenges posed by digital technology. (France)
  • GDC (as well as other SoF outcomes) is a multilateral solution (Moldova); a triumph of / reaffirmation of commitment to multilateralism (Philippines, Panama); a building block for a (stronger) multilateralism (Singapore, Jamaica). Its implementation requires transformative multilateralism (Vanuatu, on behalf of Pacific SIDS). But it is also a demonstration of challenges in multilateralism (Ethiopia).
  • There is a need for effective and inclusive implementation of the GDC (Nepal, on behalf of the Group of LDCs; Zambia).
  • The following countries welcomed / provided overall support for GDC: Bulgaria, Rwanda, St. Kitts and Nevis, Egypt, Central African Republic, Lithuania, North Macedonia, Samoa on behalf of Alliance of Small Island States, Tuvalu, AU, Zimbabwe, India, Armenia, Slovakia, Cyprus, Monaco, Marshall Island, Belize, Eswatini, United Arab Emirates, Thailand, Madagascar, Papua New Guinea, Bangladesh, Türkiye.
  • GDC, although commendable and significant, lacks ambition and boldness. (Brazil)
  • Dissociation from GDC consensus. Criticism: undermining of UN’s intergovernmental nature; selective quoting of several principles of international law, while making no mention of the principle of non-interference in the domestic affairs of sovereign states; attempts to put non-government entities and governments on an equal footing when taking decisions on the international technological agenda; attempts to establish additional review bodies with unclear mandates. (Russian Federation)
1.2. Vision for the digital future
  • Human-centred, rights-based digital future that leverages AI to advance the SDGs and ensure information integrity. (Bulgaria)
  • Open, safe, secure, sustainable, inclusive, where opportunity knows no borders. (Sweden) 
  • Open, secure, and inclusive digital future. (Georgia, Norway)
  • An inclusive, open, safe, and secure digital future for everyone rests on three essential pillars: human rights, multistakeholder governance, and inclusion. (New Zealand)
1.3. Digital cooperation 
  • General call/support for digital cooperation (Sierra Leone, on behalf of G7+; Singapore) that would pinpoint human rights principles (Burkina Faso). 
  • Need for a more effective framework of international cooperation (Cabo Verde) to address risks associated with cybersecurity threats, militarisation of tech (e.g. AI) (Cabo Verde), disinformation and cybercrime (Zambia), and misuse of tech (Georgia, Cambodia).
  • Need for a more effective/strengthened/enhanced international (digital) cooperation to:
  • address unequal access to STI (Cabo Verde), as well as divides and inequalities (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Côte d’Ivoire, Cambodia); and ensure (equitable – Seychelles) access to (digital) tech and infrastructure (Seychelles, Comoros), including AI (Iraq);
  • Address the challenges and harness the opportunities (esp. for developing countries) of new/cutting-edge tech such as AI and robotics. (Jamaica, Georgia);
  • Promote human rights online and offline. (Georgia)
  • Need to strengthen cooperation between governments and different stakeholders to achieve a safe digital future where technology is available to everyone and nobody is left behind. (United Arab Emirates)
  • Need to harness digital cooperation to improve lives while addressing potential threats. Governments to act as catalysts and facilitators, while embracing multistakeholder action. (Malta)
  • Need to prevent an east-west fragmentation of the digital space. (Pakistan)
  • Need to respect the commitments made in regional and international forums regarding digital cooperation. (Burundi)
1.4. Role of the UN
  • Vital role for the UN as countries navigate the new possibilities, opportunities, and risks of digital technologies, including AI. (Japan)
  • Challenges related to climate change, technology, sustainable development cannot be solved without the UN. (Finland)
1.5. Need for digital governance rules and norms
  • Need for robust public guardrails for high-risk applications. (Belgium)
  • Need to improve governance of emerging technologies. (Côte d’Ivoire)
  • Need to create conditions for ‘digital humanism’ and define the rights and obligations of the virtual world, as well as tools for their enforcement. Ensure that the rules of the online world mirror those of the physical world. (Slovakia)
  • Underscoring efforts to establish adequate norms for the ethical use of technology with respect to human rights and freedoms. (Monaco)
  • Need for common rules to unlock technology’s transformative potential, while mitigating the risks. (Singapore)
  • Need to regulate technologies (e.g. AI, gene editing, robotics) in line with principles of inclusiveness and ethics, to ensure it is a positive force. (Andorra)
  • Need for balanced global regulation for the safe and responsible use of technology. (India)
  • Support the ‘good governance’ of the digital world. (Portugal)
  • Need for a global governance system that promotes the transfer of knowledge and technology and establishes parameters for the correct use of AI. (Peru)
  • Need global digital governance that ensures that national sovereignty and integrity are upheld. (India)
  • Need to make global governance more just and equitable. (China)
  • Need for effective participation of the Global South countries in the governance of the internet and AI. (Iran)
  • Need for an international legal framework to ensure technology serves humanity and is shared equitably, and to protect against threats of cybercrime. (Eritrea)
1.6. Internet governance
  • Call for implementation of the GDC to make internet governance more inclusive. (Zambia)
  • Need for effective participation of the Global South countries in the governance of the internet and AI. (Iran)
  • Reference to a risk of fragmentation of the internet because of national regulations. (Sao Tome and Principe)

2. AI technology and governance 

2.1. AI potentials, challenges, and risks 
  • AI is offering (global) opportunities to improve economic productivity and decision-making processes. (Malawi, Colombia)
  • AI has the potential to empower generations to transform economies (Jamaica), and generate wealth and jobs. (Spain) 
  • AI has the potential to help strengthen cohesion, tolerance and help us to counter hate speech. (UAE) 
  • AI has a role to play in advancing sustainable development and solving complex challenges (Jamaica, Czechia, UAE, Dominican Republic, Tonga on behalf of PIF), in areas such as ensuring food, water, energy security, and addressing climate change (Slovenia, Colombia).
  • Commitment to human-centred AI to drive SDG progress. (Republic of Korea)
  • A vision for a future where clean-energy-enabled AI transforms productivity, frees time for people and societies, and leads to wealth creation. (Colombia)
  • References to national initiatives on AI. (Brazil, Russian Federation, Slovenia, Saudi Arabia)
  • AI is creating new challenges to jobs and livelihoods. (Jamaica, Saudi Arabia, Colombia)
  • There are challenges related to the misuse of AI for the spread of disinformation, including in the context of conflicts. (Colombia)
  • Challenges related to energy consumption in the context of AI development and use. (Colombia)
  • Existential threats: If unregulated, AI may threaten completely the existence of human civilization as we know it. (Barbados)
  • Insufficient awareness about AI and genAI. AI could be both a contributor to common good and a tool to ‘upset global balances’. (Italy)
2.2. AI inequalities & capacities
  • Challenges for LDCs to cope with / exploit the power of AI. (Malawi, Eswatini)
  • Need to overcome disparities in order to harness the benefits of AI for all. (Jordan, Libya)
  • Need to make AI accessible and inclusive for all within the context of ethical and digital sovereignty, and ensure that it is not turned into a tool of exclusion or exploitation. (Dominican Republic) 
  • China to propose an AI Capacity Building Action Plan for good and for all. (China)
  • Reference to a Singapore-Rwanda cooperation to develop an AI Playbook for Small States, to empower small countries to leverage AI for public good. (Singapore)
2.3. AI, peace and security 
  • AI posing security challenges. (Jamaica) AI should not pose a risk to international security. (Kazakhstan)
  • Need for a more effective framework of international cooperation to address the militarisation of AI. (Cabo Verde)
  • Need for legally binding prohibitions and regulations of autonomous weapons systems. (Austria)
  • Pact for the Future propelling governments towards establishing norms to govern lethal autonomous weapons. (Philippines)
  • 2024 Responsible AI in the Military Domain Summit in Seoul & the Blueprint for Action as an initiative that foundation for norms and governance on responsible AI in the military domain. (Republic of Korea)
2.4. International cooperation on AI & AI governance
  • GDC has the potential to mitigate the impact of AI. (Brazil) It is a step towards a human-centered, rights-based digital future that leverages AI to advance the SDGs and ensure information integrity. (Bulgaria) It sets the foundation needed to secure a future where AI serves humanity, upholds shared values, and benefits everyone. (Sweden) The Pact shows commitment to confront global challenges related to AI. (Germany)
  • Need for international cooperation to ensure AI benefits everyone & enable (equal) access of all countries, in particular developing ones, to AI tools and capacities. (Comoros, Iraq, Jamaica)
  • Crucial to build a global governance system that promotes the transfer of knowledge and technology and establishes parameters for the correct use of AI. (Peru)
  • Need for collaboration across governments, civil society, the private sector, and multilateral organisations to drive responsible and ethical development and use AI. (Brazil)
  • Need for international cooperation to address the challenges and harness the opportunities of AI. (Jamaica). 
  • Need to ensure that AI is harnessed by human beings and is human centric. Key role of multilateralism in this regard as demonstrated by the Pact. (Italy) 
  • Commitment to contribute to global efforts to ensure safe, innovative, and inclusive use of AI. (Republic of Korea)
  • Need for equal and effective participation of the Global South countries in the governance of AI. (Iran)
  • The governance of AI and data as a shared responsibility, guided by ethical considerations for the greater good of humanity. (Mauritius)
  • Council of Europe’s Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law as a potential example of addressing global issues through concerted multilateral efforts. (Lithuania, Andorra)
  • AI Seoul Summit in May 2024 and the Seoul Declaration of Safe, Innovative, and Inclusive AI, as an effort to pursue a global human-centric AI governance. (Republic of Korea). 
  • Human-centric AI at the centre of Italy’s G7 presidency agenda. (Italy)
  • Leading multilateral international cooperation to bridge social, economic, and AI-related gaps, recognising that AI could either greatly enhance or widen these disparities. (Saudi Arabia)
2.5. UN role
  • The UN’s role is more vital than ever in navigating the possibilities, opportunities, and risks of AI. (Japan)
  • UN to play a key role in defining the global governance system around AI. (Spain)
  • The UN needs to develop an international consensus to address AI challenges and protect future generations. (Costa Rica)
  • Support for the UN as the main channel in AI governance. (China)
  • Need for an annual global dialogue on AI governance under UN auspices. (Burkina Faso)
  • Support for the establishment of a scientific international independent panel on AI. (Costa Rica)
  • Need to capture  the power of AI, including through a scientific panel, governance, as well as funding through a fund. (Pakistan)
  • Support for HLAB’s and its report. (Spain, Uzbekistan)
2.6. AI regulation 
  • Need for more efforts in regulating the use of AI. (India)
  • Need for international rules that promote AI ethical use, transparency in its developments, and a guarantee for fair access. (Spain)
  • Urgent need for a regulatory framework for AI ethics that encompasses the lifecycle of AI and addresses, inter alia, data protection, accountability, bias, and the impact of AI on employment. (Holy See)
  • Need to regulate AI  in line with principles of inclusiveness and ethics, to ensure it is a positive force. (Andorra)
  • EU Artificial Intelligence Act as standard for a strong, forward-looking regulation that can serve as an inspiration for all. (Belgium)

3. Science, technology, innovation (STI) & development

3.1. General
  • STI as a foundation for sustainable development (Iraq, Oman, Lesotho, Nicaragua, Costa Rica) and growth (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Sri Lanka).
  • Need to harness STI cooperation to improve lives while addressing potential threats. Governments to act as catalysts and facilitators, while embracing multistakeholder action. (Malta)
  • Investments in STI are crucial. (Trinidad and Tobago)
  • Need for all regions to be able to contribute to research and development. (Belgium)
  • Urgency to harness the transformative potential of technology and innovation (Rwanda) in a way that promotes/protects human rights and serves peaceful purposes. (Republic of Korea)
  • References to national initiatives, policies, efforts related to STI: commitment to STI to advance development (South Sudan, Eritrea); implementing a multisectoral marine spatial planning based on science, data, and traditional knowledge (Palau); establishment of innovation hubs, industrial and science Parks, as well as incubator centres. (Zimbabwe)
  • Ref. to unilateral sanctions and coercive measures that prevent countries from tech development. (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea). (Other countries that made reference to sanctions and UCMs without specifically mentioning technology: Cuba, Ethiopia, Sudan, Equatorial Guinea, China, Belarus, Iran.)
3.2. Access to STI and inequalities
  • Need for wider access to STI (Bahrain, Burkina Faso), and a more effective framework of international cooperation to address the unequal access to STI. (Cabo Verde)
  • General call/support for cooperation in support of (access to) STI (Sierra Leone on behalf of G7+; Gabon; Côte d’Ivoir, Belize, Cambodia, Syria). Need for global cooperation in STI, towards a development model that is more sustainable and equitable. (Cuba)
  • Call for international support to be tailored to the unique characteristics of small island developing states.(Belize)
  • Global peace is essential in driving partnerships that facilitate fair and inclusive tech progress for all nations. (Brunei Darussalam)
  • Need for policies that support investment in research and technological innovation. (Democratic Republic of Congo)
  • Need for action towards a future where the Global South is recognised not as consumers of technology, but as pioneers and innovators. (Malaysia)
  • Proposal for a ‘Global Science Fund’ to encourage diverse and innovative solutions to the challenges we face, leveraging on our collective human capital. (Malaysia)
3.3. STI in the context of SoF and its outcomes
  • Confidence that SoF will promote (access to) STI. (Mongolia)
  • Pact as a hope for / reaffirmation of multilateralism that is driven by and bolsters STI, and for policies driven through scientific cooperation. (Malaysia, Panama)
  • Pact as a guide to use STI to progress in areas such as education, health, environmental sustainability. (Sri Lanka)
  • Pact as an agreement to: address barriers to full equal and meaningful access to and participation and leadership in STI; attract and support private sector investment in STI and deepen PPP. (Uganda, on behalf of G77)
  • GDC as a call to bridge the STI gap between and within the countries. (Thailand)
3.4. Tech transfers and support for developing countries
  • Need for cooperation and partnerships to build capacity, deliver technology and mobilize the necessary financial resources to facilitate access to STI opportunities. (Côte d’Ivoire)
  • Focus on scientific and technological innovations and cooperation to advance technological progress and to facilitate technology transfers. (Gabon, Maldives, Vanuatu, and Antigua and Barbuda specifically on renewable energy technology)
  • Calls on advanced nations to support affordable technology sharing and address risks from emerging technologies like AI. (Eswatini)
  • Emphasising the importance of (increasing) official assistance, technology transfer, and/or capacity building. (Nicaragua, Burkina Faso, Sri Lanka, Papua New Guinea, South Africa, Iran)
  • Urges developed countries to provide comprehensive support for transitioning to green economies, including financial resources and technology transfer. (Zimbabwe)

4. Digital technology and development 

4.1. Digital tech / transformation for development
  • Accelerated tech change bringing challenges and opportunities (Mexico), e.g. forging social connections across continents thus potentially leading to the birth of a new humanity. (Lebanon)
  • Digital technologies can drive sustainable development and social transformation when used responsibly, and they must serve all of humanity by ensuring ethical access and inclusivity. (Latvia, Guinea)
  • The digital transition can significantly support educational and economic advancements while addressing challenges of affordability and accessibility, with an emphasis on sustainable solutions. (Croatia, Libya, Andorra)
  • Prioritising innovation and adaptability is necessary to ensure that technological advancements lead to sustainable solutions and inclusive growth. (Brazil, Thailand)
  • References to national initiatives, policies, efforts on digital transformation (Iraq, Lesotho, Russian Federation, Croatia, Kyrgyzstan), digital inclusion and access (Lesotho, Maldives), and harnessing digital tech for SD (Lesotho). 
  • References to digital public infrastructures: Building holistic digital public infrastructure, exemplified by its X-Road data exchange platform, used in over 20 countries. (Estonia) Enhancing digital public infrastructures to integrate data and services into public policies. (Brazil)
  • References to cross-border digital infrastructure efforts: The EU’s Connecting Europe Facility (CEF2) advances critical digital infrastructure through joint efforts. (Bulgaria) The Bulgaria-Greece-Serbia 5G corridor boosts connectivity and addresses digital disparities. (Bulgaria)
4.2. Digital divides, inequalities, inclusion
  • Access to digital technologies is a fundamental human right, and collaborative efforts across sectors are essential for creating equitable opportunities for all. (Dominican Republic, Gambia, El Salvador)
  • Bridging the digital divide is essential for development (Pakistan) and to realise the transformative potential of digital technologies; closing this gap requires collective efforts and regional cooperation, as well as infrastructure and policy alignment with the digital era. (Vanuatu, Dominican Republic)
  • Narrowing the digital divide requires building essential infrastructure and leveraging digital technologies for the 2030 Agenda. (Maldives)
  • The digital landscape is a catalyst for change, but ongoing investment (including from digital giants) is needed in infrastructure and local innovation to address persistent disparities. (Burkina Faso, Solomon Islands)
  • Urgent actions and partnerships are needed to enhance connectivity, promote innovation, and ensure no one is left behind, particularly in small island states and among least developed countries. (Kiribati, Maldives, Tanzania)
  • Need for multilateral institutions and global frameworks to deliver further towards addressing gaps in technological capabilities. (Bangladesh)
  • Cooperation, including multilateral reform and initiatives like the EU-Africa Dialogue, is crucial for achieving an inclusive digital future and closing the digital gap. (Belgium, Jordan, Indonesia)
  • The Global Digital Compact and joint programmes aim to address digital challenges, promoting equitable access and fostering economic development, especially in the Pacific Islands and for LDCs. (Marshall Islands, Palau, Saudi Arabia, Turkiye)
  • The Pact for the Future and associated frameworks serve as roadmaps for revitalising commitment to sustainable development goals through multilateral cooperation and recognizing the transformative potential of technology. (Mauritius, Andorra)
  • Investing in digital infrastructure, technology sharing, and capacity building is vital for national development and preventing misuse, with a focus on underserved communities and promoting digital public goods. (Norway, Eswatini, India, Ghana, Papua New Guinea)
  • AI has the potential to be a positive force but risks widening gaps if the digital divide is not addressed; equitable access to its benefits must be ensured, particularly through international cooperation. (Guyana, Paraguay, Eritrea)
4.3. Capacity development and skills
  • Education, inclusion, and youth investment are crucial for reducing the digital divide and preparing for a digital future. Emphasising tech education is vital for tackling major global challenges, while comprehensive training programs like “Digital Skills for All” are essential. (Slovakia, Romania, Belgium)
  • Commits to investing in digital skills and empowering youth to lead in digital transformation and economic diversification. (Maldives)
  • Stresses the need to protect consumers, especially women and children, from online threats through reliable policies and increased digital literacy. (Russian Federation)

5. Misinformation/disinformation & content governance 

5.1. General
  • References to the challenges of technology (including AI) being misused for hate speech (Eritrea, South Oman, Brazil) and disinformation/misinformation (Eritrea, Romania, Bulgaria, Thailand, Slovakia, Ghana, Sao Tome and Principe, Brazil). Need for ensuring a human-centric approach is crucial, as well as securing a free, open and secure cyberspace (Romania)
  • Commitment to freedom of expression and combating disinformation, hate speech, and foreign interference on social media platforms. (Sao Tome and Principe)
  • A united approach is seen as essential to confront disinformation. (Zambia)
  • Reference to countering hate speech with digital technology. (UAE, Israel)
  • Need to build resilience to the spread of disinformation via digital tech. This could be done through building information integrity and promoting media literacy (Latvia), as well as comprehensive awareness campaigns and knowledge sharing (Ghana)
  • In the G20 Digital Economy discussions, Brazil proposed the topic of information integrity, reaching high-level consensus on the importance of transparency and liability for digital platforms and on the necessity of promoting a resilient and diversified information environment. (Brazil)

6. Cybersecurity

6.1. General
  • As digital services expand, so do vulnerabilities, underlining the need to ensure a safe and secure online environment. (Bhutan)
  • Online threats and dangers can be more destructive than offline ones due to their wider reach. (Slovakia)
  • There is a need to protect consumers, especially women and children, from online threats through reliable policies and increased digital literacy. (Russian Federation)
  • Cyber is emerging as a new theatre of conflict (India) and there is a need to ensure that technology is a force for good, and not used to amplify conflicts and create further instability (Finland). Threats to peace and security in cyberspace should be addressed. (USA) through efforts to restore trust, strengthen solidarity, and enhance cooperation (Sri Lanka).
  • Risks associated with cybersecurity threats and the malicious use (Moldova, Monaco) and militarisation of technologies, such as AI (Cabo Verde, Bahrain) are some of the global challenges requiring more effective cooperation.
  • Highlighting the role of AI in conflict prevention and management. (UAE)
  • Affirmation of willingness to play an active role in addressing cybersecurity (South Korea) and mitigating potential risks linked to the misuse of digital technologies (Monaco).
  • The challenge of cybercrime needs to be overcome (Thailand) with a united approach (Zambia) and an international legal framework (Eritrea).
  • Suffering hybrid threats such as cyberattacks (Ghana) due to the political situation in the region. (Moldova)
  • Cybersecurity capacity needs to be strengthened to address cyber risks. (Trinidad and Tobago)

7. Economic issues

7.1. General
  • Common understanding on cryptocurrency to combat its economic impact and links to crime. (Nigeria)
  • Transition to a digital economy to enhance global trade and reduce geographical barriers. (Angola)
  • Global minimum wealth tax and implementation of OECD/G20 tax measures for multinational cooperation, and a UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation to address tax evasion and ensure fair treatment of African economies. (Spain)
  • Digital solutions for competitiveness among Dominican businesses, with emphasis on digital education and support for SMEs. (Dominican Republic)
  • Digital banking and protection from online threats are essential for economic growth and consumer safety. (Russian Federation)
  • Equal and effective Global South participation in internet and AI governance to combat monopolistic practices. (Iran)

8. Data and data governance

8.1. General
  • The positive impact of massive data collection and AI advancements, empowering decisions based on facts and science. (Slovakia)
  • International data governance needs to be improved (Pakistan), inclusive (Burkina Faso) and equitable (Pakistan).
  • National commitment to technological innovation through the establishment of a Tier 3 commercial data centre. (El Salvador)

9. Human rights and online safety

9.1. General
  • Aiming for a human-centred, rights-based digital future. (Bulgaria, Portugal) 
  • Reference to the need to protect human rights in the digital space. (Vanuatu on behalf of Pacific SIDS)
  • Need to ensure that digital technologies are human-centric and safeguard human rights. (Belgium, Romania, Ireland, Andorra, Republic of Korea, Czechia, Austria)
  • Reference to the need for accountability for online actions while ensuring respect for universal human rights. (Slovakia)
  • References to the importance of privacy and personal data protection. (Tanzania, Bulgaria, Andorra)
  • The importance of designing digital technologies to minimise the risk of violating rights and doing harm; Transparency and user involvement in technology development and implementation can help achieve these aims. (Norway)
  • Need for policies and/or regulatory frameworks that uphold human rights, protect users from online harms and abuses, and ensure well-being, particularly for vulnerable groups like women and children. (Laos, Belgium, Andorra, Bulgaria, Brazil)
  • Commitment to establish norms for ethical use of technologies, which is respectful of both human rights and the basic freedoms of all people. (Monaco)
  • GDC is a commitment to protecting/respecting human rights in the digital space. (Sweden, USA, Latvia, Ewsatini, New Zealand)
  • EU’s GDPR as a standard for a strong, forward-looking regulation that could serve as an inspiration for all. (Belgium)

Unique speakers

614

Total speeches

675

Total time

191.867 minutes

2.0 days, 5.0 hours, 17.0 minutes, 47.0 seconds

Total length

385.733 words

385733 words, or 0.66 ‘War and Peace’ books

Total arguments

446

Agreed points

57

Disagreed points

25

Fastest speakers @ Summit of the Future 2024

Alondra Nelson

208.01 words/minute

Vilas Dhar

218.45 words/minute

Gerbrand Haverkamp

203.42 words/minute

Most used policy words during Summit of the Future 2024

2505 mentions

The session that most mentioned the word future:

(Plenary segment) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 5th plenary meeting, 79th session | 414 mentions

1983 mentions

The session that most mentioned
the prefix digital:

(Interactive Dialogue 3) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session (410 mentions)

525 mentions

The session that most mentioned the abbreviation AI:

AI/Gen AI for the Global Goals | 105 mentions

127 mentions

The session that most mentioned
the prefix internet:

A Digital Future for All (morning sessions) | 44 mentions

96 mentions

The session that most mentioned the word risk:

A Digital Future for All (afternoon sessions) | 14 mentions

Visual map of Summit of the Fature (arguments and speakers)

[tooltip] {
position: relative;
}

[tooltip]:hover:after {
content: attr(tooltip);
position: absolute;
left: 3%;
margin-top: 5px;
transform: translateX(-50%);
font-size: 16px;
min-width: 120px;
padding: 0 10px;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
border-radius: 3px;
background: #bdb6b6;
color: #000;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
font-weight: lighter;
width: 350px;
padding: 5px 10px;
}

body .container {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100vh;
}

body .container div:first-child {
margin-bottom: 3em;
}

body .container div:first-child *:first-child {
margin-top: 0;
}

body .container.second {
background-color: #333;
color: #fff;
}

body .container.three {
animation: colored 18s infinite;
background: linear-gradient(124deg, #99e6c0, #78cad2);
background-size: 1800% 1800%;
}

@keyframes colored {
0% {
background-position: 0% 82%;
}

50% {
background-position: 100% 19%;
}

100% {
background-position: 0% 82%;
}
}

body .container.three a {
color: #333;
}

body .fa-question-circle {
color: #424242;
cursor: pointer;
transition: color 180ms;
font-size: 20px;
}

body .fa-question-circle:hover {
color: #2dd881;
}

Knowledge graph

/* Title Section */
.accordion-title {
padding: 15px 30px; /* Less padding on top and bottom (15px), more on the sides (30px) */
font-size: 28px;
font-weight: 700;
text-align: center; /* Align text to the left */
background: #b71520;
color: white;
border-radius: 12px;
box-shadow: 0 12px 24px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
margin-bottom: 40px;
width: 100%; /* Full width of the container or page */
transition: box-shadow 0.3s ease, transform 0.3s ease;
cursor: pointer;
box-sizing: border-box; /* Ensures padding is included in the width */
}

/* Hover effect through JS (the class will be added via JS) */
.accordion-title.hovered {
box-shadow: 0 15px 30px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2); /* Stronger shadow on hover */
transform: translateY(-5px); /* Slight lift effect */
}
.accordion {
width: 100%;
padding: 0 10px;
}

/* Accordion Item Styles */
.accordion-item {
margin: 15px 0;
border-radius: 10px;
overflow: hidden;
box-shadow: 0 10px 20px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05);
transition: transform 0.3s ease, box-shadow 0.3s ease;
background-color: white;
position: relative;
}

.accordion-item:hover {
transform: scale(1.02);
box-shadow: 0 15px 25px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}

/* Accordion Header */
.accordion-header {
padding: 20px;
font-size: 20px;
font-weight: 500;
cursor: pointer;
transition: background-color 0.3s ease;
user-select: none;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
background-color: white;
}

.accordion-header:hover {
background-color: #f0f0f0;
}

/* Accordion Content */
.accordion-content {
max-height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 0 20px;
background-color: #f9f9f9;
transition: max-height 0.5s ease-in-out, padding 0.5s ease-in-out;
}

.accordion-content p {
margin: 15px 0;
color: #333;
line-height: 1.6;
}

.accordion-item.active .accordion-content {
max-height: 500px;
padding-bottom: 30px;
}

.accordion-header::after {
content: '⌵'; /* Down arrow */
font-size: 18px;
transition: transform 0.5s ease-in-out;
}

.accordion-item.active .accordion-header::after {
transform: rotate(-180deg); /* Up arrow when active */
}

@keyframes fadeSlideDown {
0% {
opacity: 0;
transform: translateY(-10px);
}
100% {
opacity: 1;
transform: translateY(0);
}
}

.accordion-item.active .accordion-content {
animation: fadeSlideDown 0.5s ease-in-out;
}

Q&A

How can we reform and strengthen the multilateral system to make it more effective in addressing global challenges?

The need to reform and strengthen the multilateral system was a major theme across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. Many world leaders and representatives emphasized that the current global governance structures are outdated and ineffective in addressing modern challenges.

In the Interactive Dialogue 1, Kenya’s President William Ruto stated that “the prevailing multilateral institutional architecture is dysfunctional or at least highly ineffective and cannot be relied upon to provide the solutions for the world that we all urgently need”.

Several concrete proposals for reform were put forward. In the 5th plenary meeting, Finland’s Alexander Stubb proposed “expanding the UN Security Council by five members, scrapping veto power, and suspending voting rights for members violating the UN Charter”.

The need for more inclusive representation was a common theme. In the Interactive Dialogue 2, Sierra Leone’s President Julius Maada Bio emphasized that “we must ensure that our efforts reflect the voices of all nations, including those of us in the Global South, particularly Africa, who often bear the brunt of global insecurity but are too frequently sidelined in decision-making processes”.

The importance of youth engagement was highlighted in the Friday Opening Ceremony, where Felipe Paullier called for “concrete commitments and meaningful youth engagement in the multilateral system”.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres summarized the overall sentiment in the Opening Plenary, calling for “deep reforms to make global institutions more legitimate, fair and effective”.

What steps are needed to reform the UN Security Council to make it more representative and effective?

Several sessions of the Summit of the Future addressed reforming the UN Security Council to make it more representative and effective. Key themes included expanding membership, revising veto powers, and ensuring better regional representation.

In the Interactive Dialogue 1, the UK representative called for more permanent seats on the Security Council for African countries and for India, Germany, Japan, and Brazil, as well as an expansion of non-permanent membership.

During the 5th plenary meeting, Finland’s Alexander Stubb proposed to expand it by five members, one from Latin America, two from Africa, and two from Asia and suggested scrapping veto power.

The Interactive Dialogue 2 saw multiple calls for reform. President Julius Maada Bio stated that Reforming the United Nations Security Council must be a priority. The current structure established after World War II no longer reflected geopolitical realities of the 21st century.

In the Interactive Dialogue 4, Indonesia’s Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi emphasized that Full reform of the UN Security Council is also imperative to make it more representative and effective in addressing challenges in peace and international security.

During the 6th plenary meeting, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken proposed specific changes, stating The United States believes that this should include two permanent seats for Africa, one rotating seat for small island developing states, permanent representation for Latin America and the Caribbean, in addition to the permanent seats for countries we’ve long endorsed, Germany, Japan, India.

In the 3rd plenary meeting, Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida noted The Summit of the Future is witnessing a clear call from member states for action on reform, with a majority supporting the expansion of both permanent and non-permanent seats.

How can we accelerate the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030?

Accelerating the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030 was a key focus across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. Leaders and experts emphasized the urgency of action, given that many SDGs are currently off-track.

Several main themes emerged for accelerating SDG implementation:

  1. Increased financing and reforms to the global financial system: Many speakers called for more funding and changes to international financial institutions. For example, in the Interactive Dialogue 1, the Chair of Uganda stated: “We call for undertaking governance reforms at the international financial institutions and multilateral development banks, and we underscore the need for enhancing representation and a voice of developing countries in decision making in the international financial architecture.”
  2. Leveraging digital technologies and AI: Many sessions highlighted the potential of digital solutions to accelerate SDG progress. In the Interactive Dialogue 3, Doreen Bogdan-Martin from ITU stated that “game-changing digital solutions can accelerate 70% of the SDG targets.”
  3. Improving access to and use of evidence: The Towards 2030 and Beyond session focused on initiatives to synthesize and use evidence for SDG-related policy decisions. John Lavis introduced the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition, stating: “The Global SDG Synthesis Coalition hopes that a year out, we have living evidence syntheses on the highest priority SDG questions of our time. Three years out, we’re answering most of the big questions. Six years out, we’ve got the entire spectrum covered, and we’re ready for 2030 and beyond.”
  4. Strengthening international cooperation: Many leaders emphasized the need for global collaboration. In the 4th plenary meeting, Justin Trudeau of Canada stated: “We should work within institutions such as the United Nations and renew our commitment to the Sustainable Development Agenda for 2030.”

The urgency of accelerating SDG implementation was repeatedly emphasized. In the Interactive Dialogue 4, UNICEF’s Deputy Executive Director Kitty van der Heijden stated: “We’re on track to achieve about 50%, 15, 1.5 of the SDGs and we’re barely reaching one in three of the child-related indicators within the SDGs. We simply have to do better.” This sentiment was echoed across multiple sessions, with leaders calling for immediate and coordinated action to get the SDGs back on track by 2030.

What measures are needed to reform the international financial architecture to better support developing countries?

Reforming the international financial architecture to better support developing countries was a key theme discussed across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. Leaders and representatives from various countries and organizations emphasized the need for significant changes to enhance support for developing nations.

In the Interactive Dialogue 1, the Prime Minister of Uganda, speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, called for “undertaking governance reforms at the international financial institutions and multilateral development banks, and we underscore the need for enhancing representation and a voice of developing countries in decision-making in the international financial architecture, especially the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, to deliver more effective, credible, accountable and legitimate institutions”.

During the 5th plenary meeting, Pedro Sánchez of Spain advocated for strengthening multilateral development banks, boosting special drawing rights, and including contingency clauses in debt contracts. Penny Wong of Australia mentioned offering “climate resilient debt clauses in our sovereign loans by the end of 2025 to help developing countries build economic resilience in the face of climate change and other shocks”.

In the Friday Closing Ceremony, Jana Zghabi emphasized the need to “urgently reform the international financial architecture. This includes establishing a sovereign debt workout mechanism and embracing metrics beyond GDP. Financial systems should prioritize the people, not just the profits, and pave the way for equitable global development”.

The 4th plenary meeting saw Feleti Teo of Tuvalu stating: “To address this, we must champion the reform of the international financial architecture to correct deeply entrenched imbalances, drive economic diversification, and promote international partnerships that can deliver resilient prosperity”.

During the Saturday Opening Ceremony, António Guterres called for “Reform of our international financial institutions so that they supercharge resources for sustainable development and for climate action”.

In the 3rd plenary meeting, Charles Michel, President of the European Council, emphasized: “We must urgently reform our international financial architecture. We have already fulfilled our commitment to re-channel 100 billion dollars of special green rights to developing countries and the EU has taken a leading role. But we all know this is not enough. We must do more”.

These discussions highlight a clear consensus on the need for comprehensive reforms to the international financial architecture to better support developing countries, including increased representation, more accessible financing, and mechanisms to address debt sustainability and climate resilience.

How can we address the growing debt burdens of developing countries?

The growing debt burdens of developing countries emerged as a critical issue across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. Leaders and representatives from various nations and international organizations emphasized the urgent need to address this challenge.

In the Interactive Dialogue 1, the Deputy Prime Minister of Tuvalu, Panapasi Nelesoni, highlighted the dire situation faced by vulnerable nations: ‘As we face more frequent and more extreme climate disasters each year, Tuvalu faces the reality that we will either drown in debt or be drowned by the sea.’. The World Bank President, Ajay Banga, mentioned efforts to alleviate debt burdens: ‘To ease the debt burden for four countries in the Common Framework, we have committed close to $16 billion from IDA, of about half of which was pure grants, the rest concessional.’.

During the 5th plenary meeting, innovative solutions were proposed. Pedro Sánchez of Spain suggested ‘including contingency clauses in debt contracts to go beyond just simply covering natural disasters to cover other crises.’ Penny Wong of Australia mentioned offering ‘climate resilient debt clauses in our sovereign loans by the end of 2025.’

The Friday Closing Ceremony highlighted the need for systemic approaches. Betty Wainaina reported: ‘Debt servicing is crowding out SDG financing. Speakers stressed the need for global consensus to stem the rising debt crisis, including a systemic multilateral approach. Instruments, including climate resilient debt clauses and state contingent debt instruments must be rolled out at scale. Debt resolution mechanisms need to be delivered with a speed that matches the urgency of the moment.’

In the 4th plenary meeting, leaders of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) emphasized the urgency of debt relief. Fiamē Naomi Mataʻafa of Samoa stated: ‘Debt relief and access to concessional financing, including the use of the MVI, can give SIDS the breathing space we need to anchor our economy’s instability and invest in our future.’

The Saturday Opening Ceremony highlighted the unique challenges faced by African nations. Abdullahi Alim noted: ‘It’s about restructuring the way debt is measured on the continent. Unlike anywhere else in the world, the majority of the debt in Africa is actually owned by the private sector. And it’s four times more expensive to borrow debt on the continent than anywhere else in the world.’

The Opening & Plenary segment saw global leaders calling for systemic changes. Mia Mottley, Prime Minister of Barbados, advocated for ‘changing the rules of the game, shockproofing vulnerable economies’. Charles Michel emphasized: ‘We must also tackle the problem of debt because we cannot accept that low- and middle-income countries must choose between fighting poverty and fighting climate change.’

These discussions underscore the global recognition of the debt crisis facing developing nations and the urgent need for comprehensive, innovative solutions to address this challenge.

What actions are required to combat climate change and support climate-vulnerable countries?

Combating climate change and supporting climate-vulnerable countries emerged as a critical topic across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. Key themes included:

Overall, the discussions emphasized the urgent need for global cooperation, increased financing, technological innovation, and support for vulnerable nations to effectively combat climate change and its impacts.

How can we bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable access to digital technologies?

Bridging the digital divide and ensuring equitable access to digital technologies emerged as a crucial theme across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. The urgency of this issue was highlighted by several speakers, including Deemah AlYahya, Secretary General of DCO, who stated: “I’m speaking, of course, about the digital divide and the daunting number of 2.6 billion individuals and people that remain unconnected and unable to take part in all the digital age has to offer.”

The discussions emphasized several key strategies to address this challenge:

  1. Affordable Access: In the “A Digital Future for All” session, Mats Granryd from GSMA emphasized the need for affordable devices: “We need to bring down the cost of the device. We know roughly $20 is the sweet spot.”
  2. Digital Skills Development: The importance of digital education was highlighted in multiple sessions, including the “Friday Closing Ceremony” where Zongxu Xie recommended to “ensure skills are accessible through digital education.”
  3. Infrastructure Development: The need for improved connectivity was discussed, particularly for underserved communities. In “The Power of the Commons,” Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi discussed Nigeria’s efforts, stating: “We launched the 9,000 kilometers fiber optics project where government want to connect the remote societies and underserved communities.”
  4. Global Cooperation: The importance of international collaboration was emphasized, with many speakers discussing the role of the Global Digital Compact. In the “Opening & Plenary segment,” Ki-hwan Kweon of South Korea stated: “The global digital compact will enable closing the digital divides and sort of turbocharge the sustainable development goals.”
  5. Addressing Specific Divides: Speakers highlighted the need to address various aspects of the digital divide, including gender, age, and geographic disparities. In the “YouthLead” session, Clara Brown stated that “the digital divide disproportionately affects youth particularly young women in rural communities and it is crucial that we continue to sustainably fund and support work towards gender and socio-economic digital equity for youth.”

The discussions emphasized that bridging the digital divide is not just about connectivity, but also about ensuring meaningful access and use of digital technologies. As Rumman Chowdhury reported in the Saturday Closing Ceremony: “Many of our speakers today have highlighted the urgent need to reduce the digital divide, not just in terms of achieving universal connectivity, but also to ensure that everyone has access to affordable and safe digital technology and the skills and capacities to use it meaningfully to improve their lives.”

The Summit of the Future discussions underscored that bridging the digital divide is crucial for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and ensuring that the benefits of digital transformation are shared equitably across the globe.

What governance frameworks are needed for emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence?

The need for governance frameworks for emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), was a recurring theme across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. Leaders and representatives from various countries emphasized the importance of developing global governance structures for AI to ensure its responsible development and deployment.

Several key initiatives and proposals were discussed:

  • The establishment of a scientific panel on AI was proposed by multiple speakers, including Fumio Kishida of Japan who called for “establishing an independent international scientific panel on AI and initiating a global dialogue on its governance within the United Nations.”
  • The creation of an AI Capacity Building Fund was mentioned in several sessions, including by the representative from Sweden who stated: “Through GDC, we have agreed on a number of key initiatives, including a Global Digital Dialogue on AI Governance, a Scientific Panel on AI, and an AI Capacity Building Fund.”
  • The importance of the United Nations in shaping global AI governance was highlighted by several speakers, such as Pedro Sánchez of Spain who stated: “Spain has established the first AI monitoring agency in the world. And through this, we believe that the United Nations should play a key role in defining the global governance system around artificial intelligence.”

The need for a comprehensive legal and governance framework was emphasized in various contexts. For instance, in the session on “A Digital Future for All,” Brad Smith from Microsoft stated: “This technology and the companies that create it need to be subject to the rule of law. Local laws in countries, all the way to global governance, including at the United Nations.”

The Global Digital Compact was frequently mentioned as a potential framework for addressing AI governance. In the Saturday Opening Ceremony, António Guterres emphasized: “The Global Digital Compact must be a blueprint for closing digital divides and the first universal agreement on artificial intelligence laying the foundations for a global platform centered at the UN that can bring all actors together.”

Overall, there was a clear consensus on the need for international cooperation and governance frameworks for AI, with the United Nations playing a central role in coordinating these efforts.

How can we empower youth and ensure their meaningful participation in global decision-making?

The empowerment of youth and their meaningful participation in global decision-making was a recurring theme across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. Key points and proposals included:

  1. Inclusion in decision-making processes:
  2. Digital literacy and empowerment:
  3. Structural changes:
  4. Education and capacity building:
  5. Representation in international forums:

These proposals reflect a broad consensus on the importance of youth empowerment and participation in global decision-making, with emphasis on digital literacy, structural changes in governance, education, and representation in international forums.

What measures are needed to promote gender equality and women’s empowerment globally?

Promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment globally was a recurring theme across several sessions of the Summit of the Future. Key measures and focus areas discussed include:

  1. Economic empowerment and participation: Speakers emphasized the need to increase women’s participation in the digital economy and address economic barriers. Dr. Abdallah Al Dardari from UNDP highlighted the economic cost of low female participation, stating “The cost of the current level of female participation in economic activity in the Arab world is 20% of GDP every year.”
  2. Inclusion in digital transformation: Several sessions stressed the importance of including women in digital transformation efforts. In Saudi Arabia, as mentioned by Abdullah Alswaha, “And in terms of empowering women, we are proud to have had a great success story in the 21st century in terms of empowering women to reach 35 percent, going beyond the average of G20, the European Union and Silicon Valley.”
  3. Addressing the gender digital divide: Initiatives to close the digital gender gap were discussed, with Doreen Bogdan-Martin mentioning “all the work that we’re specifically targeting for girls, for women and girls to close that digital gender gap.”
  4. Participation in peace processes: The importance of including women in peacemaking and peacebuilding was emphasized. Juan Manuel Santos stated, “The elders call for the meaningful participation and inclusion of senior women in peacemaking and peacebuilding processes.”
  5. Financial and policy reforms: The UN Women representative called for “easing the debt burdens on developing countries can free up public budgets to invest in essential services that directly benefit women” and emphasized that “international financial institutions and government budgets and tax policies should be informed by gender analysis.”
  6. Health and rights: Australia’s representative Linda Burney emphasized “Policies that focus on women and girls, sexual and reproductive health rights. Policies that prioritise women and girls’ participation in public life. Policies geared towards eliminating all forms of discrimination and violence, including sexual and gender-based violence.”
  7. Leadership development: Japan’s Fumio Kishida announced, “Japan will launch a program dedicated to nurturing the next generation of leaders in the field of gender.”

These discussions reflect a comprehensive approach to gender equality, addressing economic, political, social, and technological aspects of women’s empowerment on a global scale.

How can we strengthen global health systems and prepare for future pandemics?

Strengthening global health systems and preparing for future pandemics was addressed in several sessions of the Summit of the Future, with a focus on digital transformation and international cooperation.

In the Multistakeholder Dialogue on National Digital Health Transformation, Alain Labrique highlighted that “The role of digital in creating resilient health systems became increasingly clear during the pandemic.”

During the 4th plenary meeting, the World Health Organization representative emphasized the need for “a commitment to a pandemic agreement. The COVID-19 pandemic showed that when health is at risk, everything is at risk. The outbreaks of Mpox in Africa demonstrate once again why the world needs the WHO pandemic agreement, a shared approach to share threats.”

In the Interactive Dialogue 3, Abdullah Alswaha from Saudi Arabia mentioned their use of digital health technologies, stating: “As for digital health, we have harnessed the virtual hospital model as a pioneering model around the world by serving more than 30 million pilgrims who come from over 100 countries of Saudi Arabia.”

The Interactive Dialogue 1 touched on the broader impact of health systems, with the Global Fund representative stating: “In a world where about 4.5 billion people are not fully covered by essential health services, we know that health is fundamental to eradicate poverty, achieve gender equality, economic growth, and to ensure peaceful societies.”

Finally, in the Interactive Dialogue 4, the WHO representative emphasized the need for a robust global health system, stating: “As brutally demonstrated during the pandemic, an enhanced global system must be able to promote, provide and protect health and well-being for everyone, everywhere.” They called for “a pandemic agreement to ensure equity and protect health in crises.”

What actions are required to address the root causes of conflicts and promote peace and security?

Addressing root causes of conflicts and promoting peace and security emerged as a crucial theme across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. Several key actions and principles were highlighted:

  • Strengthening international law and multilateralism, as emphasized by Andrzej Duda of Poland.
  • Placing youth at the center of development and peace efforts, as stated by José Maria Pereira Neves.
  • Collaboration between governments, international organizations, and young people on violence prevention strategies, as proposed by Martin Manyozo.
  • Protecting civilians in conflict zones and ensuring accountability, as emphasized by Simon Harris of Ireland.
  • Strengthening preventive diplomacy and addressing underlying causes of conflict, a point raised by multiple speakers in Interactive Dialogue 2.
  • Pursuing a rules-based approach for peaceful dispute resolution, as stated by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, President of Brazil.
  • Reviewing and improving UN peace operations, as proposed by António Guterres.

These discussions highlight the complex, multifaceted approach needed to address root causes of conflicts and promote sustainable peace and security globally.

How can we reform global trade systems to be more equitable and supportive of sustainable development?

The question of reforming global trade systems to be more equitable and supportive of sustainable development was primarily addressed in two sessions of the Summit of the Future.

In the Interactive Dialogue 1, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Director General of the World Trade Organization, emphasized the importance of trade in achieving sustainable development goals. She called on all nations to issue protectionism and unilateral measures that may have negative spillover effects on others, and to support the rules-based multilateral trading system with the WTO at its core, eradicating poverty and ensuring food security. She also stressed the need to reform trade-distorting subsidies.

During the Saturday Opening Ceremony, Abdullahi Alim highlighted the importance of advancing export-oriented industrial policies, particularly for African economies. He pointed out the disparity in gains from global supply chains, using the example of cashew nut production in Côte d’Ivoire compared to countries like Vietnam and India.

These discussions underline the need for a more equitable global trade system that supports sustainable development, particularly for developing economies, while maintaining a rules-based multilateral framework.

What measures are needed to address growing inequalities within and between countries?

Addressing growing inequalities within and between countries emerged as a key concern across multiple sessions of the Summit of the Future. Leaders and representatives highlighted various aspects of inequality and proposed some measures to address them:

While these discussions highlighted the multifaceted nature of inequalities and the urgent need to address them, concrete measures and action plans were often not detailed in depth. The conversations emphasized the interconnectedness of various forms of inequality and the need for comprehensive, global approaches to tackle them effectively.

How can we ensure the interests of future generations are considered in today’s decision-making processes?

The consideration of future generations’ interests in today’s decision-making processes emerged as a significant theme across several sessions of the Summit of the Future. This concern was particularly prominent in discussions about youth participation, environmental sustainability, and global governance reforms.

In the High Level Dialogue with the Secretary-General, the importance of involving younger generations in decision-making was emphasized. The Secretary-General stated, “We cannot do that if your generation is not part of the decision-making process that is still controlled by my generation, that messed up in the way it has happened.”

The Friday Opening Ceremony: Summit of the Future Action Days highlighted the current underrepresentation of youth in global decision-making. Dan Carden pointed out, “And we still have a lot of work to do, because despite more than half the world’s population being under the age of 30, only 2.8% of Members of Parliament are under 30.”

The Declaration on Future Generations was frequently mentioned as a concrete step towards considering the interests of future generations. In the Saturday Opening Ceremony: Summit of the Future Action Days, Andrew Holness stated, “With the adoption of this Declaration at the Summit tomorrow, we will be able to celebrate a universal realization that, even as we address the challenges of today, we have an obligation to protect the interests of future generations and ensure that they will inherit a planet in which they can thrive.”

The importance of reforming global governance systems to better serve future generations was also discussed. In the Interactive Dialogue 4, Jamaica’s Prime Minister Andrew Holness emphasized, “We must therefore use this opportunity to commit to reforming the multilateral system, including the international financial architecture, to be more responsive to the realities of today and capable of preparing us for the future.”

Overall, the discussions highlighted the need for increased youth participation in decision-making, the implementation of the Declaration on Future Generations, and reforms in global governance systems as key strategies to ensure the interests of future generations are considered in today’s decision-making processes.

What steps are needed to promote human rights and the rule of law globally?

Several sessions at the Summit of the Future addressed the importance of promoting human rights and rule of law globally, though specific steps were not always detailed.

In the Friday Closing Ceremony, Martin Manyozo called for a “global community must really commit to peace, youth protection, and human rights.”

The Saturday Opening Ceremony featured Hina Jilani emphasizing that transformation is “rooted in the respect for human rights, in the recognition that only a rule-based order can propel that change.”

In the plenary segments, several leaders stressed the importance of human rights and rule of law. Alexander De Croo, Prime Minister of Belgium, stated: “We should strive to lead by example. By abiding by international law, applying the principles of the UN Charter and respecting and promoting the rights enshrined in Universal Declaration of Human Rights in our countries and abroad.”

The importance of rule of law was highlighted in Interactive Dialogue 2, where Simon Harris of Ireland stated: “Our actions must reflect a firm commitment to universal values, respecting, protecting, and fulfilling all human rights.”

In Interactive Dialogue 4, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk emphasized: “To safeguard humanity, we need to foster organisational cultures that are both based on human rights and oriented towards the future.”

The discussions highlight a broad consensus on the importance of human rights and rule of law, but suggest more concrete steps and commitments may be needed to make tangible progress globally.

How can we harness science, technology, and innovation to address global challenges?

The Summit of the Future discussions extensively explored how science, technology, and innovation can address global challenges. Many sessions emphasized the transformative potential of digital technologies, particularly AI and digital infrastructure, in achieving sustainable development goals and tackling issues like climate change, health, and education.

In the High Level Dialogue with the Secretary-General, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva highlighted that “We do stand at the cusp of a remarkable transformation fueled by technological change and green innovation. We can harness higher green growth and jobs if we all concentrate on reshaping the world.”

The importance of evidence-based policymaking was stressed in the session “Towards 2030 and Beyond: Accelerating the SDGs through Access to Evidence on What Works,” where significant investments in AI-driven evidence synthesis were announced.

In the AI/Gen AI for the Global Goals session, Sanda Ojiambo emphasized the potential of AI, stating that “Gen AI can be a true game-changer for sustainability progress because it will democratize access to information, it will accelerate innovation through the solutions, through cross-disciplinary thinking, and certainly by increasing productivity.”

The role of science diplomacy was highlighted in the Building Bridges through Science Diplomacy session, where Sir Peter Gluckman noted that “Science diplomacy offers a framework for leveraging scientific expertise and innovation. By fostering partnerships across borders, we can develop comprehensive strategies that not only tackle immediate problems, but also lay the groundwork for long-term sustainable solutions.”

The importance of digital public goods was discussed in “The Power of the Commons” session, with Amandeep Gill stating that “By leveraging the potential of Digital Commons, we believe we can accelerate progress towards the 2030 Agenda.”

Throughout the summit, speakers emphasized the need for international cooperation, ethical guidelines, and inclusive access to ensure that technological advancements benefit all of humanity and contribute to sustainable development.

What measures are required to strengthen the role of regional organizations in maintaining peace and promoting development?

The role of regional organizations in maintaining peace and promoting development was discussed in several sessions of the Summit of the Future, though not extensively.

In the Interactive Dialogue 2, the representative of the African Union called for “better coordination with regional bodies towards a fairer and more targeted approach in the peace and security domain.”

During the Interactive Dialogue 4, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe representative highlighted their success in sub-regional cooperation, stating “At the OSCE we have successfully pioneered sub-regional cooperation, including on addressing climate change, be that in Central Asia, in Eastern Europe, Southeastern Europe or in the South Caucasus.”

In the Plenary segment & Closing session, the Economic Cooperation Organization representative outlined their regional development strategy: “Aligned with the Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030, we at ECO crafted the Vision 2025, which aims to boost trade, enhance connectivity, secure transition towards green energy, and promote sustainable economic growth and the welfare of our people.”

The importance of regional organizations was also noted in the 4th plenary meeting, where the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia representative stated: “Organizations like SICA are crucial in addressing global challenges at the regional level and can serve as a valuable outreach platform for the U.N.”

How can we improve global cooperation on issues such as migration, refugees, and internally displaced persons?

Global cooperation on migration, refugees, and internally displaced persons was addressed in several sessions of the Summit of the Future. The need for financial support and collaboration between humanitarian and development actors was emphasized in the Interactive Dialogue 2, where the UNHCR representative stated: “We need your financial support” for humanitarian aid and called for collaboration “from the start of the response to a crisis.”

In the 4th plenary meeting, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees representative advocated for a shift in perception, stating: “Let us all, donors, host countries, the private sector, the UN, civil society, displaced people, all work towards the vision of the Global Compact on Refugees, where refugees are seen as an opportunity and not a burden, and they can think of a future in which they are not refugees.”

The importance of international cooperation and resource investment was highlighted in the Interactive Dialogue 4, where the Warbe Development Foundation representative from Bangladesh called for “stronger international cooperation and investment of resources based on equity, solidarity, and shared responsibility.” They also emphasized that “Migration should be a key cross-cutting issue in future SDG framework due to its impact on growth, equity, and rights.”

Technological solutions were also discussed, with Kelly T. Clements from UNHCR presenting an example of using blockchain technology to provide aid to refugees in Ukraine during the A Digital Future for All (morning sessions).

Lastly, the Friday Closing Ceremony emphasized the importance of youth involvement, with Aryan Sanghrajka discussing the need to “scale support for youth-led action, delivering on the Compact for Young People and Humanitarian Actions objective” and “ensure that young refugees move beyond education and into decent work.”

What actions are needed to reform and strengthen the UN development system to better support countries in achieving the SDGs?

The reform and strengthening of the UN development system to better support SDG achievement was mentioned in several sessions, though often without extensive detail on specific actions. In the 5th plenary meeting, Pedro Sánchez of Spain highlighted Spain’s role as “the main contributor to the Joint Sustainable Development Goal Fund” and his participation in “the leaders group for the Secretary General’s SDG Stimulus Plan”.

In the Interactive Dialogue 1, the UK representative called for “more investment in the UN Peacebuilding Fund and a sustainable resident coordinator system improving coordination and delivery within countries”. He also emphasized the importance of being “ambitious when renewing the four-year mandate of the United Nations Development System later this autumn”.

During the 6th plenary meeting, Secretary-General António Guterres emphasized the need for “renewed effective multilateralism” to address global challenges and achieve the SDGs.

In the 3rd plenary meeting, Guterres called for “deep reforms to make global institutions more legitimate, fair and effective, based on the values of the UN Charter”. Charles Michel of the EU stated: “We must also reform multilateral development banks and we must address the problem of sovereign debts”.

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
const accordionItems = document.querySelectorAll('.accordion-item');

accordionItems.forEach(item => {
const header = item.querySelector('.accordion-header');

header.addEventListener('click', () => {
const openItem = document.querySelector('.accordion-item.active');

// Close the open accordion if there's one
if (openItem && openItem !== item) {
openItem.classList.remove('active');
openItem.querySelector('.accordion-content').style.maxHeight = 0;
}

// Toggle the current accordion
if (item.classList.contains('active')) {
item.classList.remove('active');
item.querySelector('.accordion-content').style.maxHeight = 0;
} else {
item.classList.add('active');
const content = item.querySelector('.accordion-content');
content.style.maxHeight = content.scrollHeight + 'px';
}
});
});
});

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
const accordionTitle = document.querySelector('.accordion-title');

accordionTitle.addEventListener('mouseenter', function() {
accordionTitle.classList.add('hovered');
});

accordionTitle.addEventListener('mouseleave', function() {
accordionTitle.classList.remove('hovered');
});
});

cross-circle